Sunday, March 17, 2024

Lutterloh Patterns Come Alive!

 Supplement 332 - Model #5 - 2024

Loose fitting, full figure, knit top
 
   Hi there fellow Lutterloh sewists. Spring is almost here and the newest Lutterloh supplement is full of promise for a new wardrobe! This recent top seemed like a good start to ease into some warmer weather. It's another full figure pattern adapted to fit my less than full figure.
 
Pattern Hints:
   This pattern surprised me a little with a very loose fit and longer length. I anticipated a looser top from examining the pattern lines but the fashion drawing, with the hand in her pocket, disguised the true length of this top. It hits just at the bottom of the crotch. That's not really long enough to be a tunic but certainly longer than the average T-shirt. Below is the miniature of the pattern pieces.
 

  You can see that there isn't much shaping at the waist. The red lines are roughly where I reduced the waist for a slightly closer fitting top. The center back seam also gives a little more opportunity for more shaping at the waist. Because this is a full figure pattern I used a number on the Lutterloh scale that was a full 5 dots less than my actual measurement. Even though this represents a pattern that is 10cm less than my normal measurement it still produced a fairly loose fitting top. 
 
Style Changes:
   As mentioned above I ended up taking in this top at the waist at all the seams. In addition to being a looser fitting top I also found the length to be too long for my liking. I ended up cutting off 2 inches from the bottom to get a more standard T-shirt length top. This pattern, if extended quite a bit, might also make a pretty nice dress pattern. The ruching, below the V neck, is quite flattering for a larger bust and would probably help disguise a thicker waist if made up in the original looser fit. 
 
Fabric Used/Suggested:
   My lavender fabric is close to a medium weight interlock knit. This may have contributed to my dislike of the original fit. A lighter weight, clingier knit may have been more appropriate. Now, looking at the photo, I may even take the seams in further to get a closer fit for this particular fabric. If I make this again I'll look for a rayon or bamboo blend or perhaps an ITY knit. This probably isn't a pattern that would work well in a stretch woven unless it was much closer fitting with a zipper opening.
 
Closing Hints:
    After the alterations I do like the way this top turned out. My only reservation would be that the strap in the center of the ruching was a little fiddly to apply. I was afraid that if I top-stitched it that the gathers would be distorted. I ended up hand tacking the center strap on from the inside all the way up to the neckline. I tried the top on before the strap was applied but it just didn't look finished without it. For the future I'll try to figure out another way to apply the strap.
 
Until next time then, happy sewing everyone,
 
Ann in Calif.           

8 comments:

  1. Hi I have a question about pattern number 21 in supplement 332. I am looking at the center front of the top or dress and there are no symbols for facing. Can you explain how Lutterloh intends it to be finished. I am making the top right now but I created full facings. I’m thinking I have misinterpreted this although my front finish is turning out ok. I would really welcome your thought when a pattern appears without any facing symbols. Thank you Nancy O in Wa state

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Nancy. It looks to me like this pattern is intended to have a folded back self facing. The dashed line, to the right of the button placket, is the symbol for a fold line. Lutterloh often employs this type of facing and really your only clue is to refer to the symbols page and compare the dashed line to the symbol there. When you fold on the line your facing should follow the curve of the rest of the neckline and the row of buttons then becomes your center front indicated by the VM symbol. If you apply a full, separate, facing you may find that the stand up, Mandarin, collar may not be long enough to reach the outer edge of the front. I'd be interested to hear how this works out for you since I was considering this pattern for my next project. I hope that helps.
    Ann in Calif.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this great reply. I did have to adjust the shoulder seam allowance to properly fit the collar as it was slightly too short. When I looked at this pattern I noted the fold line and the vm center front. I tried folding it back before I decided to make a facing and I found that folded back left an unfinished edge at the top near the collar. To my way of thinking that wasn’t what I wanted. Also I can tell you the collar is too wide and does not lay as the picture indicates. Nonetheless I like the pattern. You might want to check out LAGolden on pattern review as she did the dress from this pattern and that was my inspiration. I appreciate your help and look forward to all your posts. Nancy O

      Delete
    2. I have made the blouse from this pattern and I folded back the front to create a facing for the button band. There is a separate piece for the sleeve cuffs on the blouse and I think LAGolden may have confused this with the collar piece as my neckband came out exactly as the illustration. It is a lovely blouse and I’m tempted to make the dress also.

      Delete
  3. Nancy, I'm in washington did we meet at the sew expo a few years ago?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No I don’t believe so. I’ve only been using Lutterloh since 2020 and prior to that knew nothing about Lutterloh. But it’s nice to meet you now.

      Delete
  4. I did attend expo this year though and I got to meet Frank and Ralph Lutterloh at their booth. For me it was like meeting a rock star -my husband took pictures. Best day for me!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for answering my question regarding supplement 332 #21. I just thought I’d let you all know I finished my jacket. It’s on or. My user name there is Tillysews. No need to post this I just thought that perhaps you all would be interested. Thank you again for your help. Nancy’s

    ReplyDelete